Justification and the Cross
Ángel Manuel Rodríguez
A. Introduction
Justification
is an image, used to interpret the significance of Christ's death, taken from
the court of law. Two passages (2 Cor 5:18-21; Rom 5:8-9) bring together
reconciliation and justification by faith. The two terms are almost synonymous;
but they express different ideas. They are brought together because both are
actions of God made possible through the sacrificial death of Christ. Let us
concentrate on the connection between justification by faith and the cross of
Christ, or more precisely the effect of the death of Christ on the human race.
Such study must begin with Rom 5:12-19, where Paul explores the universal
significance of the death of the Lord. This is one of the most controversial
passages in the NT and deserves careful attention.
B. Analysis of Rom 5:12-21
Romans
5:12-21 seems to serve a double function. It seems to bring to an end the
previous section and introduces topics to be discussed in the following chapters
(6-8). It is usually recognized that 5:12 introduces a statement that is
interrupted and to which Paul returns possibly, in verse 18. There does seem to
be an incomplete thought in verse 12. Nevertheless, this has been considered to
be a very important passage in the interpretation of the whole section.
1. Sin and
Death Came into the World
Rom
5:12a
Therefore, just as through one man sin came (eiselthen) into the world,
and death through sin,
Several
things deserve notice as we analyze this passage.
a)
Originally Sin and Death Were not Part of the World
Nothing
is stated here about the origin of sin and death because their presence in the
world is almost taken for granted. Nevertheless, one thing is clear, sin and
death did not originate in this world; they came from outside as intruders.
Paul is simply describing how they came into the world and took control of it.
b)
Uniqueness of Adam's Sin
The
sin of Adam was unique in the history of the human race in terms of its consequences
or results. His sin opened the door for sin
to enter or come into the world. Sin is almost personified here, waiting at the
door of the world for someone to open it for him. What Adam did led to a
universal impact in that he allowed sin to take control of the world. The
preposition dia
("through") is important because it identifies the one who mediated
the entrance of sin into the world. This personification of sin is developed in
Romans 6, where sin is described as a king who enslaved the human race.
c)
"World" Designates Creation and Humanity
The
term "world" will include here not only the world of humanity but
everything God created during creation week. The world is now the place where
sin is fully active and in control. Once Adam let sin in, even the natural
world was affected by it (Rom 8:22-23). The text suggests some kind of
solidarity between Adam and the world. However, in this context the term
"world" emphasizes in a more specific way the world of humankind and
establishes a solidarity between Adam and his descendants.
d)
Death Came with Sin
Notice
that sin came into the world accompanied by another power: Death. We find the
preposition dia
("through") used twice in the passage. One with the "one
man"—through
him sin came into the world—, and the other with sin—through it death had access
to the world. Here death is designating physical as well as spiritual death.
The sin of Adam brought separation from God—spiritual death—and physical death
as the consequences of sin.
2. Death
came to All
Rom
5:12b
in this way death came to all men,
because all sinned—
a)
"In this way"
Death
is described here and in 12a as a universal phenomenon that reached all humans
as a result of the sin of one man. The act of one had a universal impact and
determined the condition and fate of the world. Paul does not speculate about
the connection between the act of one and what happened to "all."
Rather he describes the connection in terms of consequences. This is what the
phrase "and in this way"(kai
houtos) indicates. It is used in v. 12b to introduce the
consequences of the action of one man. When used in the absolute, without a
coordinating particle, it means "thus/in this way" or
"accordingly/therefore" (cf. Horst Balz, ("Houtos," Exegetical Dictionary of the NT,
vol. 2, edited by Horst Balz and Gerhard Schneider [
b)
Death for All
The
verb dierchomai
means "to go through, to reach" (U. Busse, "Dierchomai," Exegetical Dictionary of the NT,
vol. 1, p. 322) and with the preposition eis
('for, to") it means "reach, arrive at" (ibid.). The prefixed dia ("through"),
attached to the verb, increases the force of the verb suggesting the idea that
"death passed through the whole range of human kind" (James D. G.
Dunn. Romans 1-8 [
c)
Because All Sinned
Possibly
the most difficult phrase in this verse is the last one: "Because all
sinned" (NIV). The basic problem is that in the previous statements Paul
described the presence of sin and death in the world as a result or consequence
of the sin of the one, but here he seems to attribute the death of all to their
individual sinning. The translation "in whom [Adam] all sinned" is
today rejected based on linguistic grounds. The preposition used here is not en ("in") but epi ("on, for")
and the possible antecedent of the pronoun, "one man," is too far
away (eph' ho = epi ho). It is now
recognized that eph' ho
is functioning as a conjunction and that it could mean "for this reason
that, because," in a causal sense (cf. 2 Cor 5:4; Phil 3:12; 4:10). In
that case Paul would be saying that humans die not only because of Adam's sin
but also because they themselves sinned. "Paul only intends to refer to
the fact that death has overtaken all people because they all have sinned (in
their own way). For him, sin is at the same time one's fate and one's act, for
which one is responsible. . . . With and since Adam, death and sin are
inescapable. No person can avoid them" (Peter Stuhlmacher, Paul's Letter to the Romans
[Louisville, KY: Westminster, 1994], p. 86). But eph' ho ("because") could be also
functioning as the equivalent of a consecutive conjunction (like hoste), meaning "so
that, with the result that" (Joseph A. Fitzmyer, Romans [New York: Doubleday,
1993], p. 416). In that case the text would be saying that through Adam death
has reached every human being with the result that they all commit sinful acts
(Thomas R. Schreiner, Romans
[Grand Rapids, MI: Baker, 1998], pp. 274-277). As we will see the second view
seems to fit the context very well.
d)
All Sinned
The
next problem is the verb "sinned" (hamarton).
Whose sinning is this? A very common explanation is that "all sinned"
when Adam sinned. That is to say, the reason why all die is that when Adam
sinned "all" were already in Adam. His sin was the sin of humanity
and that explains why death is universal (cf. John Murray, The Epistle to the Romans
[Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 1959], pp. 182-86). This is different from the
idea that Adam's sin is imputed to each one of his descendants, to all. The
argument suggests that every person was in some realistic way in Adam when he
sinned. This interpretation faces several problems.
First,
it introduces into the passage an idea that is not present in it, namely,
the idea that humanity was in some real sense present "in Adam" when
he sinned, sinning in
him. This creates serious theological problems because it presupposes that
every individual already existed or was present in the person of Adam before he
or she was born. Such a view introduces in the Bible a dualistic view of the
human nature.
Second,
the verb hamartano
is used by Paul exclusively to refer to the actual sin of a person or
persons, not to their participation in the sin of Adam. "There is nothing
in the context or in the verse to suggest that hamarton is being used in an unusual sense and
that in every other occurrence of this verb in the Pauline epistles the
reference is quite clearly to actual sin" (Cranfield, Romans, vol. p. 279). This
concrete meaning is present in Rom 2:12 where Paul states that some people sin
apart from the law and others sin under the law, again suggesting that all are
sinners.
Third,
the phrase "all sinned" was used by Paul in 3:23 to refer to the
actual sins of the human race in order to demonstrate that all are under the
power of sin (3:9). The past tense is to be interpreted as a gnomic
aorist, indicating that sin has characterized human experience throughout
history. Stanley E. Porter writes concerning this type of aorist: "One of
the ways in which language users refer to events is to see them not simply as
confined to one temporal sphere (past, present or future) but as occurring over
time and perhaps as representative of the kind of thing which regularly occurs.
. ." (Idioms of the Greek
NT (Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press, 1994], p. 38). He gives as
an example Rom 3:23. There is not the slightest evidence in that passage to
support the idea that all sinned in Adam. In previous chapters Paul
demonstrated that Gentiles and Jews were sinners and that the only way out of
this predicament was through faith in Jesus (1:18-3:26).
Fourth,
in the next verse (5:13) Paul deals with the question of the period between
Adam and the giving of the Law and how could there have been sin before the Law
was given. If all sinned in Adam "the question of how they
could sin without further commandments just does not arise. It is because Paul
accuses all of having actively sinned against God that he must deal with the
possible objection that God's will was not revealed to men between Adam and
Moses" (A. J. M. Wedderburn, "The Theological Structure of Romans
5:12," New Testament
Studies 19 [1972-73]:352).
e)
Death and the Inevitability of Sin
We
should therefore take Paul's statement at face value and conclude that
according to him "death came to all with the result that all sinned."
Death, spiritual and physical death, is a universal phenomenon and sin is also
a universal phenomenon. In context this means that through Adam, sin as an
enslaving power came into the world, and since then no one has been able to
escape from its control. The reason for that is that as a result of the sin of
Adam death—spiritual death as separation from God and physical death—came into
the world and consequently sinning became inevitable or unavoidable for the
human race ("all sinned"). There is "no one righteous, not even
one;" "Jews and Gentiles alike are all under sin" (3:9,10).
Adam's sin separated the human race from God.
Summarizing, Paul is stating that as a
result of Adam's sin, all are born spiritually dead, unable to resist the power
of sin by themselves, making sin inescapable for all. "According to Paul, death has entered the world
as a personified power, has penetrated to all humanity like an epidemic (Rom
5:12), and as a result of the fall death has established a domain of
sovereignty (15:21; Rom 5:14, 17), in which in its turn sin came to power
(5:21) among humankind, who deserved the judgment of death through their
conduct (1:32) and had to die
(1 Cor 15:22)" (W. Bieder, "Thanatos
death," in Exegetical
Dictionary of the NT, vol. 2, p. 130).
It is important to notice that Paul does
not explain the connection between the sin of the one and the sin of the all.
He simply states the facts: The act of one brought sin as a power into the
world, sin brought death with it and because human beings are born in a state
of death, separated from God and in need of salvation, they are totally unable
by themselves to overcome sin (cf. Rom 8:6-8). As Adventists we do believe that
the sin of Adam weakened human nature making our sinning unavoidable. We have
also taught that because of Adam's sin we exist in a state of separation from
God, in condemnation and needing redemption. Because he was the representative
of the human race, what he did had an impact on all of his descendants. We
exist in solidarity with him as our common ancestor and as such he determined
the fate of the human race. Sin and death invaded the natural world and
especially human nature.
3. Sin
Death and the Law
Rom
5:13-14
For before the law sin was in the world.
But sin is not taken into
account when there is no law.
Nevertheless, death
reigned from the time of Adam to the time of Moses,
even over those who did
not sin in the likeness of the transgression of Adam,
who was a type of the one
to come.
a)
Universality of Death and the Law: An Objection
Paul
is now defending his conclusion that all sinned. This is the function of the
explanatory gar,
"for." The fundamental issue is the one of the universality of death.
The objection that could be raised against his interpretation is that sin
cannot be reckoned to the individual if the law was not in place; therefore
death as a penalty for sin could not have been a universal phenomenon before
the law came in. In order for death to be present there had to be a nexus
between sin and the law. If the two are not present then death could not be
present because sin, defined as a violation of the law, was not present (cf.
Dunn, Romans 1-8,
p. 275). In the objection sin is being defined as transgression of the law and
not as a power that invaded the world and death is considered to be only the
result of the sin of each individual.
Paul answers back by pointing to the
obvious fact that death
reigned from Adam
to Moses even over those whose sin was not, like Adam's, a violation of a
specific command. For Paul death is not only the penalty for specific sins but
the consequence or result of the sin of Adam and in that sense death was
present in the world even before the Torah was given to Israel. This is an
irrefutable fact. Humans were under the power of death and consequently they
sinned, but not exactly in the way Adam sinned. He violated a specific command
or prohibition given to him by God.
Here it is obvious that the sin of Adam is not considered to be the sin of all,
even though the consequence of Adam's sin affected all.
For Paul death is not simply the result
of sin defined as a transgression of the law; death, as a result of Adam's sin,
is a universal phenomenon, a state of alienation from God, a power from whose
grasp no one can escape. The law, Paul will argue in 5:20, gives us knowledge
of what is already there, sin (cf. 3:20; 7:7; Ivan Blazen, "In
Christ," [Unpublished paper], p. 86). "In vv. 13-14, then, Paul is
reasserting the universality of death in the face of an objection to the effect
that his own emphasis on the law as bringing wrath (4:15) would imply the
absence of death in the absence of torah" (Douglas J. Moo, The Epistle to the Romans [Grand Rapids, MI:
Eerdmans, 1996], p. 332).
b)
Adam: A Type of Christ
Adam
is described as a type of Christ in the sense that he was at the head of the
human race, its representative and what he did had an impact and determined the
fate of the race. In Adam's case, "the universal impact of his action
prefigures the universal impact of the action of Christ" (Moo, Romans, p. 334). One could
say that "Adam in his universal effectiveness for ruin is the type
which-in God's design-prefigures Christ in His universal effectiveness for
salvation. It is to be noted that it is precisely his parabasis/"disobedience"
(which has just been mentioned) and its results which constitute him the tupos tou mellontos [a type of the
one to come]" (Cranfield, Romans,
vol. 1, p. 283).
Romans 5:13-14 essentially serves to
establish the fact that death is a universal phenomena directly related to the
sinful act of Adam in terms of its direct consequence. The verses that follow
contrast the results of Adam's action with Christ's action and their respective
results.
4. The
Gift and the Trespass
Rom
5:15
But the gift is not like the trespass (paraptoma).
For
if the many (hoi polloi) died for the trespass
of the one man,
how much more did God's
grace (charisma)
and the gift that came by
the grace (dorea
en chariti) of
the one man, Jesus Christ,
overflow (eperisseusen) to the many (eis tou polous)!
a)
The Gift is not Like the Trespass
This
verse is introduced by the contrasting particle "but" because Paul
has just stated that Adam was a type of Christ and he now wants to clarify that
there are significant differences between the two of them. He immediately
states that, "The free gift is not like the trespass," that is to say, it is greater than the
trespass. Paul is not saying that the work of Christ paralleled in some way
what Adam did. He is in fact contrasting the two in order to show that what
Christ performed was greater and more meaningful than what Adam brought as a
result of his sin. The parallelism is not exactly antithetical. We do find a
contrast in the first two lines, but the opposite of "the many died"
should have been "the many will be made alive." Instead, we read,
"to the many overflowed." Observe also that "the many,"
under Adam, functions grammatically
as the subject of the verb ("the many died"), while under Christ they
are the indirect object introduced by the preposition eis ("for, to"),
which identifies them as the intended
target of the action of the verb.
The verb is perisseuo,
"to be more than enough, abound, overflow."
b) The
Abundance of the Gift
The
verb "overflow" seems
to introduce in the passage the concept of provision (cf. 2 Cor 1:5a; 4:15;
8:2; 9:8ab; Eph 1:8). It
is not emphasizing the act of justification but the extent of the provision.
This means that, "the action of grace 'overflowing to' the many through
Christ thus has the connotation of an abundant eschatological provision of righteousness
for the many and a presentation
of its riches to
them" (David A. Sapp, An
Introduction to Adam Christology in Paul [Ann Arbor, MI: University
Microfilms International, 1990], pp. 324-25). Adam's sin resulted in the fact
that the many actually die; but Christ's act of grace provided more grace than was
needed to deal with the problem created by Adam's trespass. The provision was
greater or larger than the need, and reveals God's generosity. The gift was
greater than the trespass; therefore "the free gift is not like the
trespass."
The contrast between Adam and Christ in
this passage and in the others that follow make one essential point, namely,
that "the single acts of the two respective persons have comprehensive,
all-embracing effects" (Don Garlington,
Faith, Obedience, and Perseverance: Aspects of Paul's Letter to the Romans
[Tübingen: J. C. B. Mohr, 1994], p. 99). The sinful act, the fall (paraptoma="sin, false
step") of one had a universal impact; the act of grace of the other
brought a provision of grace of such magnitude that it was even more than the
many needed. The abundance of the provision and the fact that it is offered to
all implies that from now on the destiny of all is determined by their response
to the gift that is being offered to them. The human destiny is no longer
determined by the sinful act of Adam!
5. The
Gift and Condemnation
Rom
5:16
Again, the gift (dorema) not like [the result]
of (dia) the one man's sin:
for the judgment (krima) from (eks) one [sin]
to (eis) condemnation (katakrima),
but the gift (charisma) from (ek) many trespasses (paraptoma)
to (eis) justification.
The contrast now is "between the gift and what came through Adam, rather
than with Adam's trespass as such" (Dunn, Rom 1-8, p. 280). In the previous verse the
contrast was mainly between the gift and Adam's sin. Once more we are told
that, "The free gift is not like the effect of that one man's sin."
What Christ brought is radically different from the result of the sin of Adam.
His sin brought, as a result of judgment, condemnation; a negative result. But
the gift of grace does not deal only with the one sin of Adam but with the many transgressions (paraptoma) and results (eis) in justification or
acquittal for the sinners. The gift is superior! "That one single misdeed
should be answered by judgment, this is perfectly understandable: that the
accumulated sins and guilt of all the ages should be answered by God's free
gift, this is the miracle of miracles, utterly beyond human comprehension"
(Cranfield, Romans,
vol. 1, p. 286).
But the contrast is not only between one transgression versus
Christ dealing with many
transgressions. The real contrast is located in the nature of the result of the
actions of Adam and Christ. Adam's action resulted in condemnation (eis katakrima), the gift of
God results in justification (eis
dikaioma). How is the sinner justified? This is explained in vs 17.
6.
Accepting the Gift
Rom
5:17
For if, by the trespass of the one man,
death reigned (ebasileusen) through that one man,
how much more
will those who receive
God's abundant provision (perisseia) of grace
and of the gift of
righteousness reign (basileusousin) in life
through the one man, Jesus
Christ.
Once
more the contrasts are not exact parallels, but the parallelism present in the
text is basically antithetical. The verse is introduced by the particle
"For" (gar),
which introduces a further elaboration or development of vs 16; this is an
explanatory gar.
It is important to observe that the effect of the trespass of Adam is
universal: Death reigned over all. This was already established by Paul (vs
15), but now he personifies death and makes it an enslaving power. One would
expect Paul to say that the effect of Christ's act of grace was that life
reigned over all, but he does not make that statement.
a)
Grace as Justification
The
gift of grace mentioned in vs 16 is now identified as justification. In vs 16
Paul did not identify those for whom the act of grace resulted in
justification. This he now explains in vs
b)
Grace is to be Accepted
According
to vs 16 the act of grace "has arisen in response to the many trespasses.
But not all who have trespassed will be justified. Only those who actually
receive that gracious act and the abundance of the gift of righteousness that
it brings will indeed be justified" (Sapp, Adam, p. 326). That is probably why the apostle
said that the act of grace is not like the one trespass. One could even say
that "death shows no partiality and extends its dominion 'over' all (cf.
5:14). But grace freely grants righteousness to those who will receive it and
then receives them as ruling subjects in the kingdom of grace" (Ibid.).
Grace is not an enslaving power that enters into the world and makes all people
subject to its power. This is rather a characteristic of sin and death. Grace
offers itself to humans as a gift from God and calls sinners to become members
of its kingdom, to allow themselves to be ruled by it. Verse 21 indicates that
grace reigns through righteousness, suggesting once more that "the
eschatological lordship of grace is limited rather than universal in scope. It
is a reign of those who receive grace, that is, who receive the gift of righteousness"
(Ibid., p. 323).
The fact that the grace of righteousness is
a gift supports also the idea that it is universal in its provision but not in
its salvific effectiveness unless all receive it. A gift can only be offered to
those for whom it was obtained. God has this wonderful gift of justification
for the human race and he has revealed it to us in and through Christ (Rom
3:21). But this is the justification that comes only by faith (3:21-22). We
have to receive it, to say "Yes" to the Lord.
Romans 5:17 is extremely important in the
understanding of Paul's argument because it is a summary of what he has been
saying in the previous verses and forms the basis for what he is going to add
in the following verses.
7.
Condemnation and Justification for All
Rom
5:18
Consequently (ara oun), just as through(dia) one trespass
to (eis) condemnation
for (eis) all men,
so also through (dia) one act of righteousness
to (eis) justification of life
for (eis) all men.
a)
Comparison and Contrast: Behavior and Result
Now
the main contrast is between the conduct or behavior of the two representatives
of the human race. There are no verbs in this passage; it is indeed a
"masterly compression of the different aspects picked out in the preceding
verses" (Dunn, Romans 1-8,
p. 283). This fact makes the interpretation of the verse difficult and will
require from us to look carefully at the context. But first, let us examine the
verse itself. It is formed by prepositional phrases, two main prepositional phrases
introduced by dia,
"through." We also have a comparison in which the protasis is
introduced by "as" and the apodosis by "so." Paul is not
simply comparing the behaviors of Adam and Christ and the respective
consequences, but contrasting them: "Just as through one trespass to/for (eis) all men for (eis) condemnation, so also
through one act of righteousness for/to (eis)
all men for/to (eis)
justification of life."
We also find the preposition eis used twice in each of
the prepositional phrases. The first usage introduces the extension of the action
("to all
men"). Since there is no verb in the phrase it is difficult to determine
what is the connection between "the trespass of one" and the
statement "to all men." The same applies to the second prepositional
phrase. The second use of the preposition eis
introduces the ultimate goal or result
of both actions--"to condemnation;" "to justification of
life." Paul is stressing "the correspondence between the two
contrasting causes (dia)
[disobedience\obedience] and ultimate ends (eis)
[condemnation\justification] and in between their equivalent extension (eis) [to all men]" (F.
Blass and A. Debrunner, A
Greek Grammar of the NT, [Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press,
1961], p. 255).
b)
Use of the Preposition eis
("to, for")
The
first usage of the preposition eis
is quite clear; it serves to identify those "to whom the act of Adam and
Christ extends ('to all'), that is to say, the penalty or benefits are intended
for all" (Sapp, Adam,
p. 326). The second usage is a little more complicated because it indicates
purpose or intended result and it takes not an object but a relationship or a
condition--"condemnation," "justification." The usage of the preposition does not
indicate by itself whether the purpose it points to is actually realized or
simply aimed at. This is to be decided by the context (M. J. Harris,
"Prepositions and Theology in the Greek NT," New International Dictionary of NT
Theology, vol. 3, edited by Colin Brown [Grand Rapids, MI:
Zondervan, 1978], p. 118; Stanley E. Porter, Idioms,
pp. 152-153; cf. Rom 10:1; 12:3; Col 3:10).
c)
Justification and Universalism: Justification for All
One
could argue that the parallel between Adam and Christ would require the
preposition eis
("for, to") to
have the same meaning in both cases. That is to say, if in the case of Adam its
purpose was actually realized-his action resulted in the condemnation of all-it
must have the same meaning with respect to Christ-his obedience resulted in justification
for all. This is a logical argument but it is valid only if we are willing to
embrace universalism. The condition in which we found ourselves as a result of
Adam's sin was unavoidable
and permanent.
Therefore, the condition in which "all" find themselves as a result
of the obedience of Jesus has to be unavoidable
and permanent, not
related at all to a personal decision. But this conclusion cannot be supported
by the rest of the Bible and particularly by any of the Pauline Epistles.
Universalism is not a biblical doctrine and there is no reason to introduce it
in our interpretation of Rom 5:18.
d)
Legal Universal Justification: Justification for All
Some
have tried to avoid the trap of universalism, while still emphasizing the
parallel between Adam and Christ, arguing that all were legally justified in Christ
independent of any faith-commitment but that one could reject that legal status
through a personal decision against Christ. This suggestion actually breaks the
parallel between Adam and Christ and destroys the internal logical consistency
of the argument. Let me explain. The actual result of the sin of Adam, namely
condemnation, was not something that we could reject, avoid or even accept. It
was simply ours. Pressing the parallel between Adam and Christ would mean that
the "righteousness of life" that Christ brought "to all
men" was also unavoidable and permanent. By introducing the idea of a
legal universal justification that could be rejected the parallel between Adam
and Christ, on which the argument rests, is broken. Consequently, Rom 5:18
should not be used to support the theory of legal universal salvation. The best
solution is to acknowledge that in the case of Adam the preposition eis ("for, to")
refers to the actual result of his action-it brought death for all-, but that
in the case of Christ justification is intended for all but that not all will
be justified because it has to be received, accepted. This is supported by
linguistic and contextual arguments.
e)
Contextual Analysis
It
is generally accepted that vs 18 is related to vs 12 where we find an
inconclusive statement made by Paul. In vs 18 Paul summarizes what he was
saying in vs 12 and then adds the apodosis to it. But one cannot deny that the
intervening verses contribute to the summary of vs 18 (Garlington, Faith, p. 101: "The
verse draws on two sources, one is vs 12, but the intervening verses contribute
also"). For instance we find some clear linguistic parallels with vs 16:
"condemnation" (katakrima),
"trespass" (paraptoma),
and "justification" (dikaioma-dikaiosis). We should keep in mind
that vs 16 is explained in vs 17.
Therefore, if we were to look for verbs to
interpret vs 18 we have to go back to the previous verses. We will be looking
for the following grammatical structure found in that verse: Verb + the preposition eis ("to, for") + an indirect
personal object. This same structure is used concerning Adam and
the result of his sin and Christ and the result of his salvific act. Of those
elements the only one missing in vs 18 is the verb. If we find the same
grammatical structure somewhere else in the context we could suggest that Paul
has the same verb in mind in vs 18. With respect to Adam the only place where
we find this grammatical structure is in 5:12:
|
Preposition |
Indirect Personal
Obj. |
Subject |
Verb |
|
|
to |
all |
men |
death |
spread |
The connection
with vs 12 that we just mentioned allows us to take the verb it uses to express
the same thought that we find in vs 18. Notice the parallel:
|
5:12 |
eis pantas anthropous ho thanatos dielthen |
|||
|
|
to all men |
death spread |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5:18 |
di' henos paraptomatos eis
pantas anthropous [ho thanatos dielthen] |
|||
|
|
through one trespass |
to all |
men |
[death spread] |
In an attempt
to be loyal to what Paul is saying it is necessary to use the phrase
"death spread" from vs
We should now deal with vs18b and the verb
that needs to be supplied there. It was the context, as we have seen, that
informed us about how the disobedience of Adam affected all men. We should do
the same with respect to the work of God in Christ. Here we have to look for
the same grammatical structure: verb
+ eis ("for, to") + indirect personal object.
The answer is found in vs 15 which is developed and clarified in vss 16-17.
|
5:15 |
he charis. .
. eis tous pollous eperisseusen |
|||
|
|
grace |
to
the many |
abounded |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5:18 |
eis panta
athropous [he charis eperisseusen] |
|||
|
|
to all |
men |
[grace
abounded] |
|
It
seems to us that this is what the context suggests. The benefit of this
approach is that there is some control in the selection of the verbs to be used
in vs 18 making it unnecessary for the interpreter to introduce his or her own
preference.
It is also interesting to notice that the
two usages of the preposition eis
("for, to") + an
impersonal object in vs 18 finds their parallels in the immediate
context, applied once to Jesus and once to Adam.
|
5:16 |
eis katakrima (Adam) |
|
eis dikaioma
(Christ) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5:18 |
eis katakrima (Adam) |
|
eis dikaiosin tsoes (Christ) |
This shows
that Paul is expressing in vs 18 ideas found already in the previous verse; he
is probably summarizing what he stated before. Nevertheless, finding a verb for
vs 18 is not indispensable for its proper understanding. The preposition eis ("for, to")
can be used, as we already did, to elucidate the meaning of the verse.
It is useful to remember that in vs 17 is a
development of vs 16. The noun "abundance," used in vs 17, is
associated with justification by faith and those who receive it. According to
vs 17, that abundance of God's grace is to be received or appropriated by the
believer. Therefore, the second preposition eis
in vs 18 points to that which the act of Christ was aiming. God's grace
revealed in Christ does have universal relevance. God wants every individual to
be saved, but the fact that justification and life are both mentioned in vs 18
and that both are "gifts (dorea,
5:15d, 17b) to be received (5:17b) by faith demonstrates that Christ's death
does not result in the justification of all men" (Sapp, Adam, p. 327). Justification
as "life" belongs only to those who believe. Once more we can see the
provision is universal in its extent but limited in its effect because of human
freedom.
8. Made
Sinners Through Adam; Made Righteous Through Christ
Rom
5:19
For just as through (dia) the disobedience of
one man
the many were made (kathistemi) sinners,
so also through (dia) the obedience of the one man
the many will be made (kathistemi) righteous.
a) Meaning of the Verb Kathistemi
("Made")
This
passage is not as complicated as the previous one. The verse emphasizes the
kind of people that individuals have become "as a result of the work of
Adam and Christ respectively: by his disobedience, Adam has turned his
posterity into sinners, while Christ, by his obedience, has made his people
righteous" (Garlington, Faith,
p. 103). Notice that the same verb is used in the comparison or contrast
between Adam and Christ. But perhaps more important, when associated with Adam
the verb is in the past tense while when associated with Christ it is in the
future tense. The verb kathistemi
in its passive form means "to be instituted as something, to
become something" and is the equivalent of "to become" (ginomai; see Albrecht Oepke,
"Kathistemi,"
Theological Dictionary of the
NT, vol. 3, edited by Gerhard Kittel [Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans,
1965], p. 445). How did the many become sinners? The answer is given in verses
12 and 13: Because of Adam's sin, death came into the world alienating us from
God and making it impossible for any person to escape the enslaving power of
sin. We are sinners not only because we commit sinful acts but because we are
by nature separated from God. The context does not suggest that the sin of Adam
was imputed to the many. The "many" become righteous when they accept
by faith the gift of justification (v. 17), thus bringing to an end their
alienation from God.
b)
Use of "Many" and "All"
Logically,
vs 18 provides the basis for what is said in vs 19 and that is why it is
introduced by the explanatory gar.
The shift from "all men" in vs 18 to "the many" is also
significant. In the Semitic languages the totality of a group is referred to by
the term "many." Those languages did not have the adjective
"all" in the sense of "every;" they usually used a noun (kol=the totality; pas=every, the whole , pl.
all things) (see, G. Nebe, "Polus,"
Exegetical Dictionary of the
NT, vol. 3,
p.132). Instead, the OT used the pl. of rab="much,"
"many," "great," rabbim.
In Greek hoi polloi could have an
exclusive meaning, that is, it means "many but not all." However, in
the NT the inclusive meaning prevails--"all." In Romans 5 the term
designates the totality of two groups, those who belong to Adam and those who
belong to Christ, who have received the gift of grace. We also find the
expression in vs 18 "all men" which means the totality of humankind.
The provision was made for the human race but the only ones who benefit from it
are the "many," the totality of those who belong to Jesus.
We can conclude that Rom 5:12-19 describes
the event of the cross as an act of grace of God through Christ. This act has
as its goal the totality of the human race. There is enough grace to save the
whole human race from beginning to end. The cross of Christ revealed that
abundance of grace but the human race has to receive it, to take the gift
brought into existence by God. The gift is in essence the gift of righteousness
by faith. Those who accept it become part of the "many" who are in
Christ. It is therefore important to observe that the comparison between Adam
and Christ is rather a contrast and does not require equivalency of action or
result. In fact what Christ did was greater, larger in its extent and power
than what Adam did.
9. Law and
Sin
Rom
5:20-21
Paul
returns now to topic of the law. He mentions a historical fact-the law was
given after sin was in the world-, and a theological conclusion-the law joined
the connection existing between sin and death with the intention of unmasking
sin as sin (Rom 7:3). The law reveals sin for what it is-a state of rebellion
that results in eternal condemnation. It increases sin in the sense that it
identifies it. The law is totally unable to change the condition created by
Adam but makes it unbearable. This results in something positive: Grace is
revealed in all of its majesty and power as God's loving disposition to forgive
sinners.
The last verse is the conclusion or summary
of the discussion. It was the intention of God's grace to remove the human race
from the dominion of sin and death. Sin reigned accompanied by or in the
dominion of (en,
"in") death, but now grace reigns by virtue of/by means of (dia) the gift of
justification that results in (eis)
eternal life.
C. General Remarks and Conclusion
Paul
is obviously contrasting the result of the sin of Adam with the result of the
salvific work of Christ. He is not arguing that the way sin came into the world
parallels the way the gift of God came into the world. The parallel is
basically limited to the fact that what Adam did had a universal impact and
what Christ did also has a universal impact. The implicit reason is that Adam
stood at the head of the human race and what he did determined the fate of his
descendants. Now Christ is the one who stands at the head of the human race and
determines its destiny in terms of the response we give to his offer of
salvation (Rom 5:17). Since Adam could not pass on to his descendants what he
did not posses, the result of his sin was death and sin for all members of the
human race. Grace is not an enslaving power but its benefits are intended for
all human beings (it has a universal dimension) who by faith receive it. Grace,
like sin and death, reigns, but it does it through righteousness not through
fate.
The idea that every human being was in Adam
when he sinned is totally foreign to the passage under consideration. To argue
that when Adam sinned we all sinned because we were in him is to introduce in
the Bible a wrong understanding of human nature. Implicit in the statement that
we were in Adam is the idea that we pre-existed our natural birth and that
therefore we are also responsible for Adam's sin. Biblical anthropology rejects
any type of anthropological dualism and teaches that a human being is an
indivisible unit for whom it is impossible to exist in a non-physical form. By
insisting that we were in Adam and sinned when he sinned is being taught,
unintentionally, that we are responsible for actions committed by us outside
our personal physical form but inside the body of Adam. Those who promote this
view are not using that language in a metaphorical way because according to
them we actually sinned, became sinners, in the sin of Adam. Only persons are
responsible for their actions, therefore, we had to exist in some form when
Adam sinned in order to be responsible for his sin. Such ideas are foreign to
Rom 5:12-21.
However, we must acknowledge that the sin
of Adam had a universal impact. That is exactly what Paul is arguing. We are
all sinners, we are all separated from God because of the sin of Adam. Paul
explains what he means by saying that when Adam sinned sin and death came into
the world. Certainly, Adam's sin is not our sin, but he made it impossible for
any human being not to sin because death as a universal power came into the
world as a result of Adam's
sin. This is
physical and spiritual death. We were separated from God as a race with a human
nature that could not resist the power of sin. Our sinful condition was
followed by sinful acts because we were spiritually dead. Paul says, "The
sinful mind is hostile to God. It does not submit to God's law, nor can it do
so. Those controlled by the sinful nature cannot please God" (Rom 8:7). It
is that natural condition that we obtained from Adam; "in Adam all
die" (1 Cor 15:22). We are sinners not because when Adam sinned we, who
allegedly were in him, sinned, but because we came under the power of death,
separated from God, making sin unavoidable or inescapable to us.
Ellen G. White states, "Adam was
endowed with a nature pure and sinless, but he fell because he listened to the
suggestions of the enemy. His posterity became depraved; by one man's
disobedience many were made sinners" ("Self-denial," Youth Instructor, 04-01-97,
pr. 01). She also comments, "Because man fallen could not overcome Satan
with his human strength, Christ came from his royal courts of heaven to help
him with His human and divine strength combined. Christ knew that Adam in
The gift of grace that came through Christ
is sufficient to save every human being, every sinner. We are constituted
righteous by accepting the gift and then we are empowered by the Spirit to
overcome sin in our lives. The law could not revive us but Christ can:
"For if a law had been given that could impart life, then righteousness
would certainly have come by the law. But the Scripture declares that the whole
world is a prisoner of sin, so that what was promised, being given through
faith in Jesus Christ, might be given to those who believe" (Gal 3:21-22).
The gift is offered to all but is received only by those who believe. Adam's
act of disobedience separated the race from God but Christ's sacrifice brings
forgiveness for our sins and re-unites us with God. Legal universal
justification is not what Paul is teaching in Rom 5:12-21.
The use of the phrase "in Christ"
to support that concept creates serious theological problems that go against
the gospel itself. The phrase "in Christ" is not found in Rom
5:12-21. This is amazing because Paul uses it very often in his epistles but
avoids it here. If we were to accept the idea that the whole human race was in
Christ as it was in Adam we create a serious theological problem. The argument
that when Adam sinned we all actually sinned because we were in him would mean
that when Christ died we actually saved ourselves or contribute to our
salvation because we were in him. That is to say, he was not our substitute and
our sin was not transferred to him because we were "in Him;" we
actually died for our sins in the same way that we actually sinned when Adam
sinned. This is an unintentional aberration of the gospel of salvation through
faith in what Christ, and only Christ, did for us on the cross. Those ideas are
clearly absent from Rom 5:12-21.
Paul describes in Rom 5:12-19 the event of
the cross as an act of divine grace. The manifestation of this gift has as its
only objective the human race. Through Christ God provided enough grace to save
the whole human race, since the time of Adam to the end of mercy. But this gift
must be accepted in order to be ours. The gift is justification by faith and
those who accept it are the "many" who are in Christ through faith in
him.
Comentarios
Publicar un comentario